Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT upheld denial of registration under s.12A(1)(ac)(iii) and s.80G(5)(iii) where applicant society failed to furnish requisite documents despite three opportunities provided by CIT(Exemption). The tribunal rejected appellant's contention regarding lack of adequate opportunity, noting that condoning such failure would set an undesirable precedent allowing applicants to bypass CIT(Exemption)'s scrutiny and seek restoration through tribunal proceedings. Finding no procedural infirmity in CIT(Exemption)'s order, ITAT confirmed rejection of registration application under s.12AB, emphasizing that appellant had sufficient chances to present documentation but failed to utilize them without justifiable cause.
ITAT upheld denial of registration under s.12A(1)(ac)(iii) and s.80G(5)(iii) where applicant society failed to furnish requisite documents despite three opportunities provided by CIT(Exemption). The tribunal rejected appellant's contention regarding lack of adequate opportunity, noting that condoning such failure would set an undesirable precedent allowing applicants to bypass CIT(Exemption)'s scrutiny and seek restoration through tribunal proceedings. Finding no procedural infirmity in CIT(Exemption)'s order, ITAT confirmed rejection of registration application under s.12AB, emphasizing that appellant had sufficient chances to present documentation but failed to utilize them without justifiable cause.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
