Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC ruled that rejection of petitioner's MEIS scrip applications was improper. Under FTP 2015-20, Export Oriented Units could claim MEIS benefits with either FIEO or EPCES registration, while exclusive EPCES registration requirement was introduced only in FTP 2023. The subsequent policy change was formalized through Circular No.78 of 2022, making EPCES membership mandatory for SEZ Units/Developers. The court found respondent's rejection order based on lack of valid RCMC during export period to be incorrect, as the mandatory EPCES registration requirement did not apply retrospectively. The impugned order was set aside and petition disposed of.
HC ruled that rejection of petitioner's MEIS scrip applications was improper. Under FTP 2015-20, Export Oriented Units could claim MEIS benefits with either FIEO or EPCES registration, while exclusive EPCES registration requirement was introduced only in FTP 2023. The subsequent policy change was formalized through Circular No.78 of 2022, making EPCES membership mandatory for SEZ Units/Developers. The court found respondent's rejection order based on lack of valid RCMC during export period to be incorrect, as the mandatory EPCES registration requirement did not apply retrospectively. The impugned order was set aside and petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.