Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC ruled in favor of petitioner's claim for MEIS benefits despite scheme expiration in February 2022. The court determined that since petitioner's application to amend 50 shipping bills was made in April 2018 when MEIS was operational, benefits cannot be denied merely due to scheme expiration. Following precedents in Technocraft Industries and L&T cases, HC rejected DGFT's argument that scheme expiry nullifies prior accrued benefits. Court emphasized that administrative delays cannot prejudice rightful claims initiated during scheme validity. Respondents directed to process MEIS scrip applications within 15 days if eligibility criteria met. Ruling reinforces principle that vested rights under government schemes survive scheme expiration when claims were timely initiated.
HC ruled in favor of petitioner's claim for MEIS benefits despite scheme expiration in February 2022. The court determined that since petitioner's application to amend 50 shipping bills was made in April 2018 when MEIS was operational, benefits cannot be denied merely due to scheme expiration. Following precedents in Technocraft Industries and L&T cases, HC rejected DGFT's argument that scheme expiry nullifies prior accrued benefits. Court emphasized that administrative delays cannot prejudice rightful claims initiated during scheme validity. Respondents directed to process MEIS scrip applications within 15 days if eligibility criteria met. Ruling reinforces principle that vested rights under government schemes survive scheme expiration when claims were timely initiated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
