Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC overturned Division Bench's interference with arbitral award concerning contract interpretation between NHAI and contractor regarding geogrid quantities. Court held that Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of Clause 51 was reasonable, finding no variation in work scope but merely difference between estimated and actual quantities required. SC emphasized limited scope of judicial intervention under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act, noting appellate jurisdiction is particularly circumscribed when reviewing orders upholding arbitral awards. Court restored original arbitral award, reinforcing principle that frequent interference with arbitration decisions undermines Act's purpose and courts must show great restraint, especially when awards are substantially upheld under Section 34.
SC overturned Division Bench's interference with arbitral award concerning contract interpretation between NHAI and contractor regarding geogrid quantities. Court held that Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of Clause 51 was reasonable, finding no variation in work scope but merely difference between estimated and actual quantities required. SC emphasized limited scope of judicial intervention under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act, noting appellate jurisdiction is particularly circumscribed when reviewing orders upholding arbitral awards. Court restored original arbitral award, reinforcing principle that frequent interference with arbitration decisions undermines Act's purpose and courts must show great restraint, especially when awards are substantially upheld under Section 34.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
