Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC upheld the extension of time limit for sale of attached immovable property u/r 68B of Income Tax Act's Second Schedule. Property was attached on 10.02.2021, with auction scheduled for 25.03.2021. Due to no bidders, Chief Commissioner validly extended sale period by one year to 31.03.2022 under second proviso to Rule 68B(1). Court rejected petitioner's argument regarding unauthorized extension and dismissed claim of exemption u/r 10 based on changed status as laborer. Extension order deemed valid as circumstances fell within permissible grounds for resale when highest bid falls below reserve price. Attachment and sale proceedings upheld as legally compliant within limitation period.
HC upheld the extension of time limit for sale of attached immovable property u/r 68B of Income Tax Act's Second Schedule. Property was attached on 10.02.2021, with auction scheduled for 25.03.2021. Due to no bidders, Chief Commissioner validly extended sale period by one year to 31.03.2022 under second proviso to Rule 68B(1). Court rejected petitioner's argument regarding unauthorized extension and dismissed claim of exemption u/r 10 based on changed status as laborer. Extension order deemed valid as circumstances fell within permissible grounds for resale when highest bid falls below reserve price. Attachment and sale proceedings upheld as legally compliant within limitation period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.