Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
HC ruled on a Benami property case where petitioners initially challenged provisional attachment orders u/s 26(3) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act. Though petitioners bypassed the standard appellate process, the court deemed their proceedings as good faith actions. The court directed petitioners to pursue appellate remedy before the Appellate Tribunal, allowing them until February 28, 2025, to file appeals. The period of pending writ petition will be excluded from limitation u/s 14 of Limitation Act. For ongoing confiscation proceedings, the Adjudicating Authority must grant petitioners adequate time as per Proviso to Section 27(1) before proceeding further. Appeals filed by the specified deadline won't be dismissed on limitation grounds.
HC ruled on a Benami property case where petitioners initially challenged provisional attachment orders u/s 26(3) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act. Though petitioners bypassed the standard appellate process, the court deemed their proceedings as good faith actions. The court directed petitioners to pursue appellate remedy before the Appellate Tribunal, allowing them until February 28, 2025, to file appeals. The period of pending writ petition will be excluded from limitation u/s 14 of Limitation Act. For ongoing confiscation proceedings, the Adjudicating Authority must grant petitioners adequate time as per Proviso to Section 27(1) before proceeding further. Appeals filed by the specified deadline won't be dismissed on limitation grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.