Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT held that service tax cannot be levied on telephone charge waivers (CFA) provided by appellants to employees. The tribunal determined that free allowances constitute discounts/concessions rather than taxable consideration since benefits accrue to employees (service recipients) rather than the appellant (service provider). The bench rejected the department's best judgment method and assumptions-based tax computation, noting the show cause notice was vague regarding specified services. Following valuation principles, only consideration flowing from service recipient to provider is includable in gross taxable amount. Goodwill cannot be arbitrarily valued for taxation. The tribunal concluded that absent actual consideration received, CFA discounts fall outside service tax purview. Appeal allowed with full relief to appellant.
CESTAT held that service tax cannot be levied on telephone charge waivers (CFA) provided by appellants to employees. The tribunal determined that free allowances constitute discounts/concessions rather than taxable consideration since benefits accrue to employees (service recipients) rather than the appellant (service provider). The bench rejected the department's best judgment method and assumptions-based tax computation, noting the show cause notice was vague regarding specified services. Following valuation principles, only consideration flowing from service recipient to provider is includable in gross taxable amount. Goodwill cannot be arbitrarily valued for taxation. The tribunal concluded that absent actual consideration received, CFA discounts fall outside service tax purview. Appeal allowed with full relief to appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.