Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
HC quashed the revisional order regarding maintainability u/s 108 of U.P. GST Act, 2017. The court clarified that Section 108(2) language "order has been subject to appeal" means an appeal must have been actually filed, not that appeal must be exhausted before seeking revision. The Revisional Authority's approach was contradictory - discussing merits while questioning maintainability. The order failed either as a merit-based decision (inadequate consideration of facts) or as a maintainability ruling (misinterpreting Section 108). The provision does not require exhaustion of appeal before revision petition. Matter remanded for fresh consideration of revision petition on merits.
HC quashed the revisional order regarding maintainability u/s 108 of U.P. GST Act, 2017. The court clarified that Section 108(2) language "order has been subject to appeal" means an appeal must have been actually filed, not that appeal must be exhausted before seeking revision. The Revisional Authority's approach was contradictory - discussing merits while questioning maintainability. The order failed either as a merit-based decision (inadequate consideration of facts) or as a maintainability ruling (misinterpreting Section 108). The provision does not require exhaustion of appeal before revision petition. Matter remanded for fresh consideration of revision petition on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
