Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
HC determined that authorities erred in denying transitional ITC claim under CGST Act s.140(5) without providing personal hearing. While petitioner incorrectly filed Form TRAN-1 by entering service tax credit details in column 5(a) instead of 7(a) for invoices received post June 30, 2017, principles of natural justice required opportunity to demonstrate compliance with statutory requirements. Authorities must allow petitioner to prove receipt of amounts after June 30, 2017, recorded in books within 30 days. Matter remanded for fresh consideration with directions to provide personal hearing and issue reasoned order on petitioner's transitional ITC claim. Petition allowed through remand.
HC determined that authorities erred in denying transitional ITC claim under CGST Act s.140(5) without providing personal hearing. While petitioner incorrectly filed Form TRAN-1 by entering service tax credit details in column 5(a) instead of 7(a) for invoices received post June 30, 2017, principles of natural justice required opportunity to demonstrate compliance with statutory requirements. Authorities must allow petitioner to prove receipt of amounts after June 30, 2017, recorded in books within 30 days. Matter remanded for fresh consideration with directions to provide personal hearing and issue reasoned order on petitioner's transitional ITC claim. Petition allowed through remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
