Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC determined that authorities erred in denying transitional ITC claim under CGST Act s.140(5) without providing personal hearing. While petitioner incorrectly filed Form TRAN-1 by entering service tax credit details in column 5(a) instead of 7(a) for invoices received post June 30, 2017, principles of natural justice required opportunity to demonstrate compliance with statutory requirements. Authorities must allow petitioner to prove receipt of amounts after June 30, 2017, recorded in books within 30 days. Matter remanded for fresh consideration with directions to provide personal hearing and issue reasoned order on petitioner's transitional ITC claim. Petition allowed through remand.
HC determined that authorities erred in denying transitional ITC claim under CGST Act s.140(5) without providing personal hearing. While petitioner incorrectly filed Form TRAN-1 by entering service tax credit details in column 5(a) instead of 7(a) for invoices received post June 30, 2017, principles of natural justice required opportunity to demonstrate compliance with statutory requirements. Authorities must allow petitioner to prove receipt of amounts after June 30, 2017, recorded in books within 30 days. Matter remanded for fresh consideration with directions to provide personal hearing and issue reasoned order on petitioner's transitional ITC claim. Petition allowed through remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
