Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Transaction between foreign enterprise and its Indian Permanent Establishment (PE) falls within transfer pricing provisions u/s 92B. ITAT held PE must be treated as distinct and separate enterprise per Article 7(2) of India-China DTAA. Transactions between foreign HO and Indian PE qualify as international transactions since both parties are non-residents, satisfying Section 92B(1) requirement. PE's functional independence is supported by OECD Model Tax Convention commentary. The underlying philosophy of transfer pricing provisions and Article 7(2) align in analyzing third-party behavior under uncontrolled conditions. ITAT rejected argument of conflict between Article 9 of DTAA and domestic transfer pricing provisions, directing ALP adjustment application to HO-PE transactions. Matter remanded to Division Bench for implementation.
Transaction between foreign enterprise and its Indian Permanent Establishment (PE) falls within transfer pricing provisions u/s 92B. ITAT held PE must be treated as distinct and separate enterprise per Article 7(2) of India-China DTAA. Transactions between foreign HO and Indian PE qualify as international transactions since both parties are non-residents, satisfying Section 92B(1) requirement. PE's functional independence is supported by OECD Model Tax Convention commentary. The underlying philosophy of transfer pricing provisions and Article 7(2) align in analyzing third-party behavior under uncontrolled conditions. ITAT rejected argument of conflict between Article 9 of DTAA and domestic transfer pricing provisions, directing ALP adjustment application to HO-PE transactions. Matter remanded to Division Bench for implementation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
