Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT examined residential status dispute of NRI taxpayer under Income Tax Act section 6(1) and applicable DTAA provisions. Appellant demonstrated presence in India for 132 days during relevant assessment year, below the 182-day threshold required for resident status. Supporting documentation included foreign employment records and visit passes. ITAT remanded matter to Assessing Officer for detailed verification of appellant's Singapore residential status and Indian non-residential position, specifically directing examination under Explanation 1 to section 6(1)(c). Appeal grounds 1-3 were allowed for statistical purposes pending final determination of residential status by AO based on documentary evidence.
ITAT examined residential status dispute of NRI taxpayer under Income Tax Act section 6(1) and applicable DTAA provisions. Appellant demonstrated presence in India for 132 days during relevant assessment year, below the 182-day threshold required for resident status. Supporting documentation included foreign employment records and visit passes. ITAT remanded matter to Assessing Officer for detailed verification of appellant's Singapore residential status and Indian non-residential position, specifically directing examination under Explanation 1 to section 6(1)(c). Appeal grounds 1-3 were allowed for statistical purposes pending final determination of residential status by AO based on documentary evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.