Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed writ petition challenging assessment order under s.143(3) r.w.s. 144B, finding no clear breach of natural justice principles to warrant bypassing alternate remedies. Show-cause notice adequately informed petitioner about unreliable sales figures and proposed assessment methodology. Final assessment order did not materially deviate from notice parameters. Petitioner's conditional request for video conferencing hearing was not mandatory since AO required no clarifications. Court held statutory appeals must be exhausted first as no patent violation of natural justice was established to justify extraordinary writ jurisdiction.
HC dismissed writ petition challenging assessment order under s.143(3) r.w.s. 144B, finding no clear breach of natural justice principles to warrant bypassing alternate remedies. Show-cause notice adequately informed petitioner about unreliable sales figures and proposed assessment methodology. Final assessment order did not materially deviate from notice parameters. Petitioner's conditional request for video conferencing hearing was not mandatory since AO required no clarifications. Court held statutory appeals must be exhausted first as no patent violation of natural justice was established to justify extraordinary writ jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
