Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
801 to 820 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s addition under s.69 regarding unexplained property investment, accepting loan from assessee's mother as legitimate source after verification of her creditworthiness in reopened assessment. On interest disallowance under s.24, ITAT directed AO to verify if assessee's investment from borrowed funds was limited to their ownership share. Interest deduction permitted only on borrowed funds used for initial property investment up to assessee's share portion, following prudent investment principle. Subsequent investments, even if from borrowed funds, deemed ineligible for s.24 interest deduction. Matter remanded to AO for verification of fund utilization patterns in bank accounts and determination of allowable interest based on initial investment share.
ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s addition under s.69 regarding unexplained property investment, accepting loan from assessee's mother as legitimate source after verification of her creditworthiness in reopened assessment. On interest disallowance under s.24, ITAT directed AO to verify if assessee's investment from borrowed funds was limited to their ownership share. Interest deduction permitted only on borrowed funds used for initial property investment up to assessee's share portion, following prudent investment principle. Subsequent investments, even if from borrowed funds, deemed ineligible for s.24 interest deduction. Matter remanded to AO for verification of fund utilization patterns in bank accounts and determination of allowable interest based on initial investment share.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.