Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s addition under s.69 regarding unexplained property investment, accepting loan from assessee's mother as legitimate source after verification of her creditworthiness in reopened assessment. On interest disallowance under s.24, ITAT directed AO to verify if assessee's investment from borrowed funds was limited to their ownership share. Interest deduction permitted only on borrowed funds used for initial property investment up to assessee's share portion, following prudent investment principle. Subsequent investments, even if from borrowed funds, deemed ineligible for s.24 interest deduction. Matter remanded to AO for verification of fund utilization patterns in bank accounts and determination of allowable interest based on initial investment share.
ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s addition under s.69 regarding unexplained property investment, accepting loan from assessee's mother as legitimate source after verification of her creditworthiness in reopened assessment. On interest disallowance under s.24, ITAT directed AO to verify if assessee's investment from borrowed funds was limited to their ownership share. Interest deduction permitted only on borrowed funds used for initial property investment up to assessee's share portion, following prudent investment principle. Subsequent investments, even if from borrowed funds, deemed ineligible for s.24 interest deduction. Matter remanded to AO for verification of fund utilization patterns in bank accounts and determination of allowable interest based on initial investment share.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
