Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
HC dismissed petitions challenging territorial jurisdiction of Additional Commissioner, Kanpur to adjudicate show cause notices (SCNs) issued by DGGI Ahmedabad under CGST Act. Petitioners contested jurisdiction based on Circular 169/2022 and Notification 2/2022, arguing Additional Commissioner lacked All-India jurisdiction. Court held that as per Notification 31/2018, Additional/Joint Commissioner has authority to determine tax liability for SCNs issued by DGGI. Court directed petitioners to raise jurisdictional and other contentions during adjudication proceedings, declining to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 at this preliminary stage.
HC dismissed petitions challenging territorial jurisdiction of Additional Commissioner, Kanpur to adjudicate show cause notices (SCNs) issued by DGGI Ahmedabad under CGST Act. Petitioners contested jurisdiction based on Circular 169/2022 and Notification 2/2022, arguing Additional Commissioner lacked All-India jurisdiction. Court held that as per Notification 31/2018, Additional/Joint Commissioner has authority to determine tax liability for SCNs issued by DGGI. Court directed petitioners to raise jurisdictional and other contentions during adjudication proceedings, declining to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 at this preliminary stage.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
