Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC directed state authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim promptly following inaction on previous requests. The authorities must verify facts, assess entitlement, and consider the state government's order dated 10.10.2018 along with subsequent relevant orders. Court noted petitioner's argument that GST had been refunded in similar cases. State authorities were instructed to examine the claim comprehensively, factoring in both verification requirements and precedent of comparable refund situations. The decision emphasizes administrative duty to process tax refund claims efficiently while maintaining proper verification protocols. Petition disposed with specific directions for immediate processing of refund claim.
HC directed state authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim promptly following inaction on previous requests. The authorities must verify facts, assess entitlement, and consider the state government's order dated 10.10.2018 along with subsequent relevant orders. Court noted petitioner's argument that GST had been refunded in similar cases. State authorities were instructed to examine the claim comprehensively, factoring in both verification requirements and precedent of comparable refund situations. The decision emphasizes administrative duty to process tax refund claims efficiently while maintaining proper verification protocols. Petition disposed with specific directions for immediate processing of refund claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
