Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
HC directed state authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim promptly following inaction on previous requests. The authorities must verify facts, assess entitlement, and consider the state government's order dated 10.10.2018 along with subsequent relevant orders. Court noted petitioner's argument that GST had been refunded in similar cases. State authorities were instructed to examine the claim comprehensively, factoring in both verification requirements and precedent of comparable refund situations. The decision emphasizes administrative duty to process tax refund claims efficiently while maintaining proper verification protocols. Petition disposed with specific directions for immediate processing of refund claim.
HC directed state authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim promptly following inaction on previous requests. The authorities must verify facts, assess entitlement, and consider the state government's order dated 10.10.2018 along with subsequent relevant orders. Court noted petitioner's argument that GST had been refunded in similar cases. State authorities were instructed to examine the claim comprehensively, factoring in both verification requirements and precedent of comparable refund situations. The decision emphasizes administrative duty to process tax refund claims efficiently while maintaining proper verification protocols. Petition disposed with specific directions for immediate processing of refund claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
