Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1221 to 1240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT admitted additional ground regarding exemption under s.10(15)(iv)(h) for interest income from PSU bonds/debentures, following NTPC precedent and Bombay HC ruling in Siva Equipment. Matter remanded to AO for verification of eligibility criteria. On s.80G deduction claim, following previous ITAT ruling for AY 2006-07, issue remanded to AO for fresh examination. Regarding computation u/r 2 of First Schedule (s.44), ITAT affirmed that life insurance business profits must be calculated as annual average surplus between inter-valuation periods per Insurance Act 1938 requirements. Revenue's appeal dismissed on all grounds, maintaining consistency with prior coordinate bench decisions. AO directed to verify factual aspects of exemption claims while adhering to statutory provisions.
ITAT admitted additional ground regarding exemption under s.10(15)(iv)(h) for interest income from PSU bonds/debentures, following NTPC precedent and Bombay HC ruling in Siva Equipment. Matter remanded to AO for verification of eligibility criteria. On s.80G deduction claim, following previous ITAT ruling for AY 2006-07, issue remanded to AO for fresh examination. Regarding computation u/r 2 of First Schedule (s.44), ITAT affirmed that life insurance business profits must be calculated as annual average surplus between inter-valuation periods per Insurance Act 1938 requirements. Revenue's appeal dismissed on all grounds, maintaining consistency with prior coordinate bench decisions. AO directed to verify factual aspects of exemption claims while adhering to statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
