Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
ITAT admitted additional ground regarding exemption under s.10(15)(iv)(h) for interest income from PSU bonds/debentures, following NTPC precedent and Bombay HC ruling in Siva Equipment. Matter remanded to AO for verification of eligibility criteria. On s.80G deduction claim, following previous ITAT ruling for AY 2006-07, issue remanded to AO for fresh examination. Regarding computation u/r 2 of First Schedule (s.44), ITAT affirmed that life insurance business profits must be calculated as annual average surplus between inter-valuation periods per Insurance Act 1938 requirements. Revenue's appeal dismissed on all grounds, maintaining consistency with prior coordinate bench decisions. AO directed to verify factual aspects of exemption claims while adhering to statutory provisions.
ITAT admitted additional ground regarding exemption under s.10(15)(iv)(h) for interest income from PSU bonds/debentures, following NTPC precedent and Bombay HC ruling in Siva Equipment. Matter remanded to AO for verification of eligibility criteria. On s.80G deduction claim, following previous ITAT ruling for AY 2006-07, issue remanded to AO for fresh examination. Regarding computation u/r 2 of First Schedule (s.44), ITAT affirmed that life insurance business profits must be calculated as annual average surplus between inter-valuation periods per Insurance Act 1938 requirements. Revenue's appeal dismissed on all grounds, maintaining consistency with prior coordinate bench decisions. AO directed to verify factual aspects of exemption claims while adhering to statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
