Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
During a 2014 search operation, seized cash adjustment against advance tax liability was denied per Section 132B and Explanation 2. ITAT held that while self-assessment tax qualifies as 'existing liability', the assessee failed to include seized cash in total income computation. The matter of adjusting seized cash against self-assessment tax was remanded to AO for verification of circumstances similar to precedent case. Regarding interest u/s 220, ITAT ruled the assessee cannot be deemed in default as seized cash was already with Department within 30-day notice period. AO directed to adjust seized cash against tax liability if self-assessment tax adjustment relief is denied post verification.
During a 2014 search operation, seized cash adjustment against advance tax liability was denied per Section 132B and Explanation 2. ITAT held that while self-assessment tax qualifies as 'existing liability', the assessee failed to include seized cash in total income computation. The matter of adjusting seized cash against self-assessment tax was remanded to AO for verification of circumstances similar to precedent case. Regarding interest u/s 220, ITAT ruled the assessee cannot be deemed in default as seized cash was already with Department within 30-day notice period. AO directed to adjust seized cash against tax liability if self-assessment tax adjustment relief is denied post verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
