Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
During a 2014 search operation, seized cash adjustment against advance tax liability was denied per Section 132B and Explanation 2. ITAT held that while self-assessment tax qualifies as 'existing liability', the assessee failed to include seized cash in total income computation. The matter of adjusting seized cash against self-assessment tax was remanded to AO for verification of circumstances similar to precedent case. Regarding interest u/s 220, ITAT ruled the assessee cannot be deemed in default as seized cash was already with Department within 30-day notice period. AO directed to adjust seized cash against tax liability if self-assessment tax adjustment relief is denied post verification.
During a 2014 search operation, seized cash adjustment against advance tax liability was denied per Section 132B and Explanation 2. ITAT held that while self-assessment tax qualifies as 'existing liability', the assessee failed to include seized cash in total income computation. The matter of adjusting seized cash against self-assessment tax was remanded to AO for verification of circumstances similar to precedent case. Regarding interest u/s 220, ITAT ruled the assessee cannot be deemed in default as seized cash was already with Department within 30-day notice period. AO directed to adjust seized cash against tax liability if self-assessment tax adjustment relief is denied post verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
