Business deductions and transfer pricing issues: tribunal treatment of software write-offs, donation receipts, warranty provisions, and related expens...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2921 to 2940 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
During a 2014 search operation, seized cash adjustment against advance tax liability was denied per Section 132B and Explanation 2. ITAT held that while self-assessment tax qualifies as 'existing liability', the assessee failed to include seized cash in total income computation. The matter of adjusting seized cash against self-assessment tax was remanded to AO for verification of circumstances similar to precedent case. Regarding interest u/s 220, ITAT ruled the assessee cannot be deemed in default as seized cash was already with Department within 30-day notice period. AO directed to adjust seized cash against tax liability if self-assessment tax adjustment relief is denied post verification.
During a 2014 search operation, seized cash adjustment against advance tax liability was denied per Section 132B and Explanation 2. ITAT held that while self-assessment tax qualifies as 'existing liability', the assessee failed to include seized cash in total income computation. The matter of adjusting seized cash against self-assessment tax was remanded to AO for verification of circumstances similar to precedent case. Regarding interest u/s 220, ITAT ruled the assessee cannot be deemed in default as seized cash was already with Department within 30-day notice period. AO directed to adjust seized cash against tax liability if self-assessment tax adjustment relief is denied post verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
