Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1221 to 1240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent Order-in-Original. While acknowledging statutory alternative remedy exists, HC permitted petitioner to file appeal within three weeks against Order dated 31.10.2022. Following precedent from Delhi HC, court directed that appeal be considered without requiring full pre-deposit of enhanced penalty. Petitioner allowed to proceed with pre-deposit based on initial Rs.1,00,000 penalty amount, without prejudice to final determination on merits by appellate authority. Court emphasized this concession on pre-deposit requirement would not influence substantive appeal determination. Petition disposed accordingly.
HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent Order-in-Original. While acknowledging statutory alternative remedy exists, HC permitted petitioner to file appeal within three weeks against Order dated 31.10.2022. Following precedent from Delhi HC, court directed that appeal be considered without requiring full pre-deposit of enhanced penalty. Petitioner allowed to proceed with pre-deposit based on initial Rs.1,00,000 penalty amount, without prejudice to final determination on merits by appellate authority. Court emphasized this concession on pre-deposit requirement would not influence substantive appeal determination. Petition disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
