Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent Order-in-Original. While acknowledging statutory alternative remedy exists, HC permitted petitioner to file appeal within three weeks against Order dated 31.10.2022. Following precedent from Delhi HC, court directed that appeal be considered without requiring full pre-deposit of enhanced penalty. Petitioner allowed to proceed with pre-deposit based on initial Rs.1,00,000 penalty amount, without prejudice to final determination on merits by appellate authority. Court emphasized this concession on pre-deposit requirement would not influence substantive appeal determination. Petition disposed accordingly.
HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent Order-in-Original. While acknowledging statutory alternative remedy exists, HC permitted petitioner to file appeal within three weeks against Order dated 31.10.2022. Following precedent from Delhi HC, court directed that appeal be considered without requiring full pre-deposit of enhanced penalty. Petitioner allowed to proceed with pre-deposit based on initial Rs.1,00,000 penalty amount, without prejudice to final determination on merits by appellate authority. Court emphasized this concession on pre-deposit requirement would not influence substantive appeal determination. Petition disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
