Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent Order-in-Original. While acknowledging statutory alternative remedy exists, HC permitted petitioner to file appeal within three weeks against Order dated 31.10.2022. Following precedent from Delhi HC, court directed that appeal be considered without requiring full pre-deposit of enhanced penalty. Petitioner allowed to proceed with pre-deposit based on initial Rs.1,00,000 penalty amount, without prejudice to final determination on merits by appellate authority. Court emphasized this concession on pre-deposit requirement would not influence substantive appeal determination. Petition disposed accordingly.
HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent Order-in-Original. While acknowledging statutory alternative remedy exists, HC permitted petitioner to file appeal within three weeks against Order dated 31.10.2022. Following precedent from Delhi HC, court directed that appeal be considered without requiring full pre-deposit of enhanced penalty. Petitioner allowed to proceed with pre-deposit based on initial Rs.1,00,000 penalty amount, without prejudice to final determination on merits by appellate authority. Court emphasized this concession on pre-deposit requirement would not influence substantive appeal determination. Petition disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
