Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning disputed classification of imported internal combustion engines under transferrable DFIA license. Per N/N. 98/2009-Cus, customs duty exemption requires only that imported materials match authorization's description, value, and quantity. While export item aligned with SION Category C969, the authorization contained no explicit import restrictions or category specifications. CBEC Circular 46/2007 confirms correlation between inputs and exports needed only for specific products under para 4.55.3 of Handbook. Tribunal held appellant not required to correlate imports with original licensee's exports, as authorization language imposed no restrictions limiting engine imports to specific export-related uses. Impugned order set aside.
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning disputed classification of imported internal combustion engines under transferrable DFIA license. Per N/N. 98/2009-Cus, customs duty exemption requires only that imported materials match authorization's description, value, and quantity. While export item aligned with SION Category C969, the authorization contained no explicit import restrictions or category specifications. CBEC Circular 46/2007 confirms correlation between inputs and exports needed only for specific products under para 4.55.3 of Handbook. Tribunal held appellant not required to correlate imports with original licensee's exports, as authorization language imposed no restrictions limiting engine imports to specific export-related uses. Impugned order set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.