Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning export duty refund and interest payment on delayed refund. While appellant claimed provisional assessment, tribunal determined it was a case of final assessment requiring rectification u/s 154 of Customs Act. Revenue's 14-year delay in processing rectification warranted interest payment. Interest awarded at 12% per annum from January 11, 2011 (three months after original order-in-appeal dated October 11, 2010) until September 5/6, 2023 (refund date). Tribunal applied Ranbaxy and Sandvik Asia precedents regarding interest eligibility on delayed refunds. Case established that though initially claimed as provisional assessment, matter was treated as rectification of final assessment, triggering Section 27A interest provisions.
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning export duty refund and interest payment on delayed refund. While appellant claimed provisional assessment, tribunal determined it was a case of final assessment requiring rectification u/s 154 of Customs Act. Revenue's 14-year delay in processing rectification warranted interest payment. Interest awarded at 12% per annum from January 11, 2011 (three months after original order-in-appeal dated October 11, 2010) until September 5/6, 2023 (refund date). Tribunal applied Ranbaxy and Sandvik Asia precedents regarding interest eligibility on delayed refunds. Case established that though initially claimed as provisional assessment, matter was treated as rectification of final assessment, triggering Section 27A interest provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
