Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning export duty refund and interest payment on delayed refund. While appellant claimed provisional assessment, tribunal determined it was a case of final assessment requiring rectification u/s 154 of Customs Act. Revenue's 14-year delay in processing rectification warranted interest payment. Interest awarded at 12% per annum from January 11, 2011 (three months after original order-in-appeal dated October 11, 2010) until September 5/6, 2023 (refund date). Tribunal applied Ranbaxy and Sandvik Asia precedents regarding interest eligibility on delayed refunds. Case established that though initially claimed as provisional assessment, matter was treated as rectification of final assessment, triggering Section 27A interest provisions.
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning export duty refund and interest payment on delayed refund. While appellant claimed provisional assessment, tribunal determined it was a case of final assessment requiring rectification u/s 154 of Customs Act. Revenue's 14-year delay in processing rectification warranted interest payment. Interest awarded at 12% per annum from January 11, 2011 (three months after original order-in-appeal dated October 11, 2010) until September 5/6, 2023 (refund date). Tribunal applied Ranbaxy and Sandvik Asia precedents regarding interest eligibility on delayed refunds. Case established that though initially claimed as provisional assessment, matter was treated as rectification of final assessment, triggering Section 27A interest provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
