Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT upheld the exclusion of period from 12.04.2023 to 01.07.2024 from the Resolution Plan implementation timeline. The Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), an association representing 250 allottees, had demonstrated substantial implementation efforts by infusing Rs.7 crores out of Rs.10 crores, pursuing environmental clearances, and restoring electricity connections. During this period, an interim order restricted the SRA from transferring units and realizing Rs.50 crores. The Tribunal found that since the Resolution Plan's approval was under challenge with an operative interim order, the exclusion of implementation period was justified. The interim orders affecting financial execution warranted timeline extension. Appeal dismissed, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's order dated 28.08.2024.
NCLAT upheld the exclusion of period from 12.04.2023 to 01.07.2024 from the Resolution Plan implementation timeline. The Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), an association representing 250 allottees, had demonstrated substantial implementation efforts by infusing Rs.7 crores out of Rs.10 crores, pursuing environmental clearances, and restoring electricity connections. During this period, an interim order restricted the SRA from transferring units and realizing Rs.50 crores. The Tribunal found that since the Resolution Plan's approval was under challenge with an operative interim order, the exclusion of implementation period was justified. The interim orders affecting financial execution warranted timeline extension. Appeal dismissed, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's order dated 28.08.2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
