Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT upheld the exclusion of period from 12.04.2023 to 01.07.2024 from the Resolution Plan implementation timeline. The Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), an association representing 250 allottees, had demonstrated substantial implementation efforts by infusing Rs.7 crores out of Rs.10 crores, pursuing environmental clearances, and restoring electricity connections. During this period, an interim order restricted the SRA from transferring units and realizing Rs.50 crores. The Tribunal found that since the Resolution Plan's approval was under challenge with an operative interim order, the exclusion of implementation period was justified. The interim orders affecting financial execution warranted timeline extension. Appeal dismissed, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's order dated 28.08.2024.
NCLAT upheld the exclusion of period from 12.04.2023 to 01.07.2024 from the Resolution Plan implementation timeline. The Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), an association representing 250 allottees, had demonstrated substantial implementation efforts by infusing Rs.7 crores out of Rs.10 crores, pursuing environmental clearances, and restoring electricity connections. During this period, an interim order restricted the SRA from transferring units and realizing Rs.50 crores. The Tribunal found that since the Resolution Plan's approval was under challenge with an operative interim order, the exclusion of implementation period was justified. The interim orders affecting financial execution warranted timeline extension. Appeal dismissed, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's order dated 28.08.2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
