Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
HC set aside the denial of input tax credit u/s 16(2)(c) and 16(4) of CGST/SGST Acts. The court directed reconsideration of petitioner's ITC claim in accordance with relevant circulars discussed in M. Trade Links case if factual circumstances are similar. The first respondent was instructed to pass fresh orders within two months from receipt of certified judgment copy. The decision established that blanket denial of ITC solely based on statutory provisions without considering applicable circulars and similar precedents is not sustainable. The matter was disposed of with specific directions for fresh assessment of the ITC claim.
HC set aside the denial of input tax credit u/s 16(2)(c) and 16(4) of CGST/SGST Acts. The court directed reconsideration of petitioner's ITC claim in accordance with relevant circulars discussed in M. Trade Links case if factual circumstances are similar. The first respondent was instructed to pass fresh orders within two months from receipt of certified judgment copy. The decision established that blanket denial of ITC solely based on statutory provisions without considering applicable circulars and similar precedents is not sustainable. The matter was disposed of with specific directions for fresh assessment of the ITC claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
