Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT ruled against the assessee regarding applicability of section 92BA in a power supply transaction case. The Tribunal held that claiming deduction u/s 80IA is not prerequisite for invoking section 92BA provisions. The assessee's captive thermal plant transactions with related parties required arm's length price determination. The TPO correctly used internal comparables (power supply to 14 independent consumers) rather than state utility rates for benchmarking. The average rate of Rs. 2.97 per unit charged to other units, compared to assessee's transfer price of Rs. 7.85 per unit based on GSEB tariff, demonstrated significant price variation. The ITAT rejected assessee's argument that state electricity board rates should be the benchmark, affirming TPO's use of arithmetic mean from actual third-party transactions.
The ITAT ruled against the assessee regarding applicability of section 92BA in a power supply transaction case. The Tribunal held that claiming deduction u/s 80IA is not prerequisite for invoking section 92BA provisions. The assessee's captive thermal plant transactions with related parties required arm's length price determination. The TPO correctly used internal comparables (power supply to 14 independent consumers) rather than state utility rates for benchmarking. The average rate of Rs. 2.97 per unit charged to other units, compared to assessee's transfer price of Rs. 7.85 per unit based on GSEB tariff, demonstrated significant price variation. The ITAT rejected assessee's argument that state electricity board rates should be the benchmark, affirming TPO's use of arithmetic mean from actual third-party transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
