Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld penalty under s271B for failure to furnish tax audit report per s44AB requirements. Assessee's turnover of Rs.8,53,66,166/- exceeded statutory threshold, mandating tax audit. Claims of substantial losses, creditor payments, and partners being senior citizens were rejected as insufficient reasonable cause for non-compliance. A purported tax audit report dated 23.09.2013 submitted later was dismissed as not previously presented to lower authorities. Assessee's incomplete documentation, lacking profit-loss statements and balance sheets, undermined their position. The contradictory claim of timely audit completion was rejected. Precedents cited by assessee were distinguished on facts. Penalty order sustained as assessee failed to demonstrate reasonable cause for non-compliance with statutory audit requirements.
ITAT upheld penalty under s271B for failure to furnish tax audit report per s44AB requirements. Assessee's turnover of Rs.8,53,66,166/- exceeded statutory threshold, mandating tax audit. Claims of substantial losses, creditor payments, and partners being senior citizens were rejected as insufficient reasonable cause for non-compliance. A purported tax audit report dated 23.09.2013 submitted later was dismissed as not previously presented to lower authorities. Assessee's incomplete documentation, lacking profit-loss statements and balance sheets, undermined their position. The contradictory claim of timely audit completion was rejected. Precedents cited by assessee were distinguished on facts. Penalty order sustained as assessee failed to demonstrate reasonable cause for non-compliance with statutory audit requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.