Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT set aside additions made under s.56(2)(x)(b) regarding alleged undervaluation of immovable properties purchased below stamp duty value. The Tribunal found both lower authorities passed non-speaking orders without addressing assessee's submissions or providing reasoned findings. CIT(A)'s order demonstrated lack of application of mind, seeking reasons for delayed registration without previously requesting such information from assessee. The rejection of assessee's explanation and invocation of s.56(2)(x) lacked substantive reasoning, violating principles of natural justice under audi alteram partem. Matter remanded to AO for fresh consideration with proper opportunity for assessee to present case.
ITAT set aside additions made under s.56(2)(x)(b) regarding alleged undervaluation of immovable properties purchased below stamp duty value. The Tribunal found both lower authorities passed non-speaking orders without addressing assessee's submissions or providing reasoned findings. CIT(A)'s order demonstrated lack of application of mind, seeking reasons for delayed registration without previously requesting such information from assessee. The rejection of assessee's explanation and invocation of s.56(2)(x) lacked substantive reasoning, violating principles of natural justice under audi alteram partem. Matter remanded to AO for fresh consideration with proper opportunity for assessee to present case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.