Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding service tax liability on trailer services. The tribunal determined that since effective control and possession of trailers were transferred to clients for fixed payments, the activity constituted 'hiring' rather than 'Supply of Tangible Goods'. The transfer of right to use with possession and control placed the transaction under 'deemed sale', removing it from service tax purview. The department failed to prove retention of control by appellant. Additionally, since appellant's clients were GTAs who had already paid service tax, and appellant was not a GTA, the activity qualified as transfer by hire/rent of trucks, falling outside service tax scope. The original classification and tax demand were deemed incorrect, and appeal was allowed.
CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding service tax liability on trailer services. The tribunal determined that since effective control and possession of trailers were transferred to clients for fixed payments, the activity constituted 'hiring' rather than 'Supply of Tangible Goods'. The transfer of right to use with possession and control placed the transaction under 'deemed sale', removing it from service tax purview. The department failed to prove retention of control by appellant. Additionally, since appellant's clients were GTAs who had already paid service tax, and appellant was not a GTA, the activity qualified as transfer by hire/rent of trucks, falling outside service tax scope. The original classification and tax demand were deemed incorrect, and appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.