Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging treatment of tax claims as operational debt under IBC resolution plan. Tribunal affirmed that Section 11E of Central Excise Act and Section 82 of CGST Act create explicit exceptions regarding IBC provisions. The appellant's tax claims were correctly classified as operational debt, eligible for payment u/s 30(2)(b). No violation found as payment exceeded liquidation value u/s 53(1) waterfall mechanism. Tribunal distinguished this from Gujarat VAT precedent, noting Central Excise Act's distinct provisions. Resolution plan approval upheld as compliant with statutory requirements for operational creditor treatment of tax claims.
NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging treatment of tax claims as operational debt under IBC resolution plan. Tribunal affirmed that Section 11E of Central Excise Act and Section 82 of CGST Act create explicit exceptions regarding IBC provisions. The appellant's tax claims were correctly classified as operational debt, eligible for payment u/s 30(2)(b). No violation found as payment exceeded liquidation value u/s 53(1) waterfall mechanism. Tribunal distinguished this from Gujarat VAT precedent, noting Central Excise Act's distinct provisions. Resolution plan approval upheld as compliant with statutory requirements for operational creditor treatment of tax claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
