Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC found no statutory requirement mandating obtaining a statement as a prerequisite for issuing show cause notice u/s 122(1A) of CGST Act, 2017. Petitioner granted 4 weeks to file objections to the notice from receipt of order. Respondents directed to consider objections according to law, providing reasonable hearing opportunity before proceeding with assessment/adjudication. Court explicitly noted no views expressed on merits. Petition disposed of with directions for procedural compliance while preserving petitioner's right to present defense during adjudication process.
HC found no statutory requirement mandating obtaining a statement as a prerequisite for issuing show cause notice u/s 122(1A) of CGST Act, 2017. Petitioner granted 4 weeks to file objections to the notice from receipt of order. Respondents directed to consider objections according to law, providing reasonable hearing opportunity before proceeding with assessment/adjudication. Court explicitly noted no views expressed on merits. Petition disposed of with directions for procedural compliance while preserving petitioner's right to present defense during adjudication process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
