Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
HC set aside adjudication order u/s 74(9) of WBGST/CGST Act 2017 and remanded for fresh consideration. The adjudicating authority failed to address key submissions regarding input tax credit claims against supplies from deregistered vendors, particularly concerning retrospective cancellation of supplier registrations and proof of goods movement. The court found procedural deficiencies as the assessing officer did not record findings on precedents cited by assessee. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication with directions to consider all factual issues, legal principles, and grant personal hearing. Appellant permitted to submit fresh reply with supporting documentation and judicial precedents.
HC set aside adjudication order u/s 74(9) of WBGST/CGST Act 2017 and remanded for fresh consideration. The adjudicating authority failed to address key submissions regarding input tax credit claims against supplies from deregistered vendors, particularly concerning retrospective cancellation of supplier registrations and proof of goods movement. The court found procedural deficiencies as the assessing officer did not record findings on precedents cited by assessee. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication with directions to consider all factual issues, legal principles, and grant personal hearing. Appellant permitted to submit fresh reply with supporting documentation and judicial precedents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
