Charitable institution cannot lose exemption merely because some activities incidentally benefit a religious community; retrospective registration can...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2661 to 2680 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC set aside adjudication order u/s 74(9) of WBGST/CGST Act 2017 and remanded for fresh consideration. The adjudicating authority failed to address key submissions regarding input tax credit claims against supplies from deregistered vendors, particularly concerning retrospective cancellation of supplier registrations and proof of goods movement. The court found procedural deficiencies as the assessing officer did not record findings on precedents cited by assessee. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication with directions to consider all factual issues, legal principles, and grant personal hearing. Appellant permitted to submit fresh reply with supporting documentation and judicial precedents.
HC set aside adjudication order u/s 74(9) of WBGST/CGST Act 2017 and remanded for fresh consideration. The adjudicating authority failed to address key submissions regarding input tax credit claims against supplies from deregistered vendors, particularly concerning retrospective cancellation of supplier registrations and proof of goods movement. The court found procedural deficiencies as the assessing officer did not record findings on precedents cited by assessee. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication with directions to consider all factual issues, legal principles, and grant personal hearing. Appellant permitted to submit fresh reply with supporting documentation and judicial precedents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
