Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
HC directed State Authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim after verifying facts and entitlement. The decision stemmed from respondents' inaction despite repeated requests for GST refund collected during contract execution. Court mandated compliance with Central Government orders dated 28.01.2020 and 06.06.2018, along with subsequent relevant orders. The authorities must render appropriate decision within 90 days from order receipt. The disposition emphasizes administrative efficiency in GST refund processing while ensuring proper verification of entitlements under existing governmental directives.
HC directed State Authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim after verifying facts and entitlement. The decision stemmed from respondents' inaction despite repeated requests for GST refund collected during contract execution. Court mandated compliance with Central Government orders dated 28.01.2020 and 06.06.2018, along with subsequent relevant orders. The authorities must render appropriate decision within 90 days from order receipt. The disposition emphasizes administrative efficiency in GST refund processing while ensuring proper verification of entitlements under existing governmental directives.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
