Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Ex-Servicemen Resettlement Society successfully contested service tax liability on security services provided to medical colleges and affiliated hospitals. CESTAT ruled that security services to educational institutions qualified for exemption under Notification No.14/2004-ST. The Tribunal found that medical college hospitals serve public welfare and provide internship facilities, making them eligible for the exemption. Additionally, the Society's role in ex-servicemen welfare and job placement, where no consideration was retained and payments were direct reimbursements of salary and benefits, fell outside the service tax net. The demand for service tax was set aside as legally unsustainable, recognizing both the educational institution exemption and the non-commercial nature of resettlement activities.
Ex-Servicemen Resettlement Society successfully contested service tax liability on security services provided to medical colleges and affiliated hospitals. CESTAT ruled that security services to educational institutions qualified for exemption under Notification No.14/2004-ST. The Tribunal found that medical college hospitals serve public welfare and provide internship facilities, making them eligible for the exemption. Additionally, the Society's role in ex-servicemen welfare and job placement, where no consideration was retained and payments were direct reimbursements of salary and benefits, fell outside the service tax net. The demand for service tax was set aside as legally unsustainable, recognizing both the educational institution exemption and the non-commercial nature of resettlement activities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.