Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT ruled reimbursement expenses of salary incurred during manpower supply services (2010-13) are not includible in taxable value for service tax purposes when acting as pure agent. The Tribunal emphasized that u/ss 66 and 67 of the Act, only the service component constitutes taxable value, distinguishing between reimbursement and remuneration. The demand was held time-barred as no suppression existed, with records being publicly available and regularly audited. The Tribunal followed precedent establishing that reimbursement expenses are not taxable, only the remuneration component attracts service tax. The appeal was allowed, confirming that salary reimbursements as pure agent are excludible from service tax valuation.
CESTAT ruled reimbursement expenses of salary incurred during manpower supply services (2010-13) are not includible in taxable value for service tax purposes when acting as pure agent. The Tribunal emphasized that u/ss 66 and 67 of the Act, only the service component constitutes taxable value, distinguishing between reimbursement and remuneration. The demand was held time-barred as no suppression existed, with records being publicly available and regularly audited. The Tribunal followed precedent establishing that reimbursement expenses are not taxable, only the remuneration component attracts service tax. The appeal was allowed, confirming that salary reimbursements as pure agent are excludible from service tax valuation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.