Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CESTAT overturned the rejection of input service tax refund claims. The Tribunal held that various input services had demonstrable nexus with output services, making them eligible for refund except for 4 services. The computation method using Gross Eligible CENVAT Credit instead of Closing CENVAT Balance was affirmed. Issues regarding reverse charge mechanism payments and foreign currency invoices were resolved. While procedural lapses involving unregistered premises (Rs. 2,03,867) remained contested, the Tribunal directed verification of central registration status. Matter remanded to original authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with findings on service nexus and eligibility criteria.
CESTAT overturned the rejection of input service tax refund claims. The Tribunal held that various input services had demonstrable nexus with output services, making them eligible for refund except for 4 services. The computation method using Gross Eligible CENVAT Credit instead of Closing CENVAT Balance was affirmed. Issues regarding reverse charge mechanism payments and foreign currency invoices were resolved. While procedural lapses involving unregistered premises (Rs. 2,03,867) remained contested, the Tribunal directed verification of central registration status. Matter remanded to original authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with findings on service nexus and eligibility criteria.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
