Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The GST Council approved formation of a GoM on restructuring Compensation Cess to examine revenue impacts on states post-GST implementation. Key points: Karnataka raised concerns about revenue loss of approximately 0.7% of GSDP despite higher GST collections and growth rates compared to national average. The state clarified this was due to being a producer state under destination-based taxation. The Council agreed to form a GoM chaired by Minister of State (Finance) to: - Analyze state-wise revenue data considering COVID-19 impacts - Review compensation cess structure beyond March 2026 - Examine challenges faced by manufacturing states - Consider solutions within GST's destination-based framework Pre vs Post-GST comparison shows: - Pre-GST (2012-16): 8.3% growth rate, 11.5% GDP growth, 0.72 tax buoyancy - Post-GST (2018-23): 12.3% growth rate, 9.8% GDP growth, 1.25 tax buoyancy The GoM will submit detailed analysis and recommendations for Council's consideration before compensation cess expires in March 2026.
The GST Council approved formation of a GoM on restructuring Compensation Cess to examine revenue impacts on states post-GST implementation. Key points: Karnataka raised concerns about revenue loss of approximately 0.7% of GSDP despite higher GST collections and growth rates compared to national average. The state clarified this was due to being a producer state under destination-based taxation. The Council agreed to form a GoM chaired by Minister of State (Finance) to: - Analyze state-wise revenue data considering COVID-19 impacts - Review compensation cess structure beyond March 2026 - Examine challenges faced by manufacturing states - Consider solutions within GST's destination-based framework Pre vs Post-GST comparison shows: - Pre-GST (2012-16): 8.3% growth rate, 11.5% GDP growth, 0.72 tax buoyancy - Post-GST (2018-23): 12.3% growth rate, 9.8% GDP growth, 1.25 tax buoyancy The GoM will submit detailed analysis and recommendations for Council's consideration before compensation cess expires in March 2026.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
