Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that validly availed input tax credit (ITC) is indefeasible unless utilized improperly. The imposition of interest u/s 50(3) requires actual utilization of the credit. Since the petitioner had not utilized the accumulated ITC after the cut-off date, the imposition of interest as per the impugned circular could not be justified. The petition was allowed.
The HC held that validly availed input tax credit (ITC) is indefeasible unless utilized improperly. The imposition of interest u/s 50(3) requires actual utilization of the credit. Since the petitioner had not utilized the accumulated ITC after the cut-off date, the imposition of interest as per the impugned circular could not be justified. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
