Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that M/s Automotive Stamping Assemblies Ltd. and M/s Majestic Ltd. should be accepted as comparable entities for TP analysis under TNMM as they were initially selected and not persistent loss-making companies. M/s Spicer India Pvt. Ltd. was rightly included despite related party transactions as TNMM requires broad comparability. For M/s JBM Auto Ltd., the issue was restored to the AO/TPO to re-adjudicate after examining segmental information. Forex losses/gains were held operating in nature being linked to import transactions. Economic adjustments were denied as not granted earlier by the Tribunal. The forex loss disallowance u/s 43A was restored to the AO for fresh adjudication based on bifurcation of capital and revenue components. The additional depreciation claim was dismissed as not claimed originally and being revenue neutral.
The ITAT held that M/s Automotive Stamping Assemblies Ltd. and M/s Majestic Ltd. should be accepted as comparable entities for TP analysis under TNMM as they were initially selected and not persistent loss-making companies. M/s Spicer India Pvt. Ltd. was rightly included despite related party transactions as TNMM requires broad comparability. For M/s JBM Auto Ltd., the issue was restored to the AO/TPO to re-adjudicate after examining segmental information. Forex losses/gains were held operating in nature being linked to import transactions. Economic adjustments were denied as not granted earlier by the Tribunal. The forex loss disallowance u/s 43A was restored to the AO for fresh adjudication based on bifurcation of capital and revenue components. The additional depreciation claim was dismissed as not claimed originally and being revenue neutral.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.