Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The appellant imported goods declared as Rutile Sand/Rutile and claimed classification under Heading 26.14 of Customs Tariff, availing exemption from CVD under N/N. 4/2006-CE. The goods contained 90-96% Titanium Dioxide as per test reports. Customs authorities examined documents like invoices, packing lists, test certificates and allowed exemption after assessment from 2007-2012. Invoking extended period of limitation for differential duty demands along with interest was held unsustainable as the appellant made correct declarations at import. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part.
The appellant imported goods declared as Rutile Sand/Rutile and claimed classification under Heading 26.14 of Customs Tariff, availing exemption from CVD under N/N. 4/2006-CE. The goods contained 90-96% Titanium Dioxide as per test reports. Customs authorities examined documents like invoices, packing lists, test certificates and allowed exemption after assessment from 2007-2012. Invoking extended period of limitation for differential duty demands along with interest was held unsustainable as the appellant made correct declarations at import. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
