Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The appellant imported goods declared as Rutile Sand/Rutile and claimed classification under Heading 26.14 of Customs Tariff, availing exemption from CVD under N/N. 4/2006-CE. The goods contained 90-96% Titanium Dioxide as per test reports. Customs authorities examined documents like invoices, packing lists, test certificates and allowed exemption after assessment from 2007-2012. Invoking extended period of limitation for differential duty demands along with interest was held unsustainable as the appellant made correct declarations at import. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part.
The appellant imported goods declared as Rutile Sand/Rutile and claimed classification under Heading 26.14 of Customs Tariff, availing exemption from CVD under N/N. 4/2006-CE. The goods contained 90-96% Titanium Dioxide as per test reports. Customs authorities examined documents like invoices, packing lists, test certificates and allowed exemption after assessment from 2007-2012. Invoking extended period of limitation for differential duty demands along with interest was held unsustainable as the appellant made correct declarations at import. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
