Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
HC dismissed the application challenging cognizance for offences u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC in a cheque dishonor case. It held the presumption u/s 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act was rightly applied. Malafides of complainant are immaterial if allegations make out a cognizable offence. Mere delay in filing complaint cannot quash proceedings unless barred u/s 468 CrPC. The contentions regarding Section 139 NI Act, malafides, and delay were rejected.
HC dismissed the application challenging cognizance for offences u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC in a cheque dishonor case. It held the presumption u/s 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act was rightly applied. Malafides of complainant are immaterial if allegations make out a cognizable offence. Mere delay in filing complaint cannot quash proceedings unless barred u/s 468 CrPC. The contentions regarding Section 139 NI Act, malafides, and delay were rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.